Healthcare

Q1
For one, a person may not be able to give informed consent in times of an emergency. It is not uncommon for people to be unconscious, disoriented, sedated or simply not capable of giving an effective consent (White, Rosoff&LeBlang,2010). In such cases, other people like the next of kin may be authorized to give consent on behalf of the patient. In the absence of such other authorized persons, the law presumes that the patient would want to be treated as necessary so as to preserve his life or function. It is incumbent upon the physician to establish that there was an emergency, that there was an immediate need to administer care, that there were attempts to contact next of kin or any other persons authorized to give consent, and lastly that the care given never went beyond the necessary until full consent can be obtained.  
Secondly, the extension doctrine allows the physician to dispense of the need for consent in the event of an unexpected complication making it medically advisable to go beyond the initial consent given. Thus in Kennedy v Parrot, the North Carolina Supreme Court saw a physician’s decision to remove as cyst as part of an appendectomy.  Elective or non essential procedures are not covered within this doctrine.
Lastly, a physician may determine than giving certain information to the patient will be harmful and thereby withhold such information. Under the principle of therapeutic privilege, a number of jurisdictions recognize that a physician may indeed have a right to withhold information in those circumstances.
Q2
For along time, Michigan law did not allow any person other than the patient to make treatment decisions. This has since changed with the Michigan Designation of Patient Advocate for Health Care. That law now allows any person who is at least 18 years old to appoint a surrogate decision maker in the event that they are no longer able to make those decisions. The appointment of such a surrogate is accomplished through what is called a Durable Power of Attorney. Through this power of attorney, the patient can appoint almost any person to make healthcare decisions on their behalf so long as that other person is 18 years and above.  The person appointed under this document is called a patient advocate. A durable power of attorney for healthcare only comes into force when the patient is unable to make healthcare decisions. The existence of a durable power of attorney for healthcare is, however, not a precondition for receiving treatment. It is not even an obligation on the part of the patient to have this legal document.
Besides a patient advocate, the Michigan Healthcare Disclosure and Consent Act list certain family members that can make healthcare decisions on behalf of the patient. Those listed are a member of the immediate family, the next of kin or the guardian. The law does not provide any guidance as to who among those in the list should take priority over the others. This law only applies when the patient has a reduced life expectancy arising from an advanced illness.
Q3
For the present purposes, the institution will be “A” while Privacy and Confidentiality are the chosen rights.
Privacy and Confidentiality Policy
At “A,” we are committed to safeguarding the privacy of our patients and staff.  To that objective, the protection of private and confidential information is our priority.
Patient Information
We follow two key values at “A” in maintaining protected health information (PHI): caring and integrity. All uses and disclosures of PHI are made with respect and sensitivity for our patients and the law. We recognize that some sensitive aspects of a patient’s life may be documented, it is for this that privacy and confidentiality is a priority to all our clients. As such, all members of the workforce must understand their role in protecting PHI and compliance with privacy laws.
Inappropriate disclosure of PHI is a violation of “A” policies besides the fact that such a violation may also be a violation of both federal and state privacy laws. Consequences of such a violation will lead to disciplinary action including the termination of employment.
Examples of Inappropriate Disclosures
Ø  Accessing the medical records of another worker to determine his/her diagnosis
Ø  Disclosing PHI about a patient or any other person to the media without approval from the patient.
Ø  Using PHI in the medical record or any other “A” database for research purposes without patient authorization.
Q4
In dealing with some of the most important rights of patients such as that on privacy and confidentiality, healthcare workers must discharge a number of responsibilities. In collecting information from clients, healthcare workers must ensure that patients give their consent for the collection. Healthcare workers must do proper documentation of the information they take as they may need it for their defense in the eventuality that a case is brought against them.
Secondly, healthy workers should also ensure that the consent from patients is informed. The consequences of any treatment option may be very substantial and it is only necessary that the healthcare discuss all the relevant information with the patient. This requirement aims to put the patient at the centre of care. Understanding the risks associated with treatments allows the patient to make a decision from a point of knowledge.
Furthermore, the healthcare workers have a duty to provide patients with their medical records when a request for such is made. Under HIPPA, healthcare workers are allowed to charge patients for the cost of copying such information.  The original records often belong to the healthcare provider while the patient has a right to obtain a copy.





 Reference

SHARE

College Assignment Samples

  • Image
  • Image
  • Image
  • Image
  • Image
    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments:

Post a Comment