The Jacksonian Period as an Era of the Common Man

His very election was a fundamental departure from what had seemed like the norm in American political life. President Andrew Jackson had risen from a very humble background. At only 13, Jackson joined the war that was then ongoing. Prior to his election, America had drawn a majority of its leadership from men of means. Americans were to be treated to a new era when this man from humble beginnings managed to win the elections of 1928. The changes that were witnessed in the political, economic and the relationships between state and federal governments have succeeded in validating the characterization of the Jacksonian era as a period of the common man.
Perhaps it is in the political sphere where this common man characterization is best exemplified. At the general level, the period saw an increase in participation in the American political life. This occurred at both the state and the national levels. A major driver for this was the extension of the right to vote. Prior practice had allowed only those who owned property to vote. Jackson thought that it was the right of all white males to vote regardless of their economic status. The property requirement was, therefore, abolished as a control on who could vote. Upon taking office in 1929, Andrew Jackson introduced the spoils system where he rewarded his political supporters with government appointments.  He saw this as a way of widening democracy. Opponents criticized this system as failing to allow those with the most qualifications to serve in government. It was also partly because of the Jacksonian democracy that women started to agitate for most of their rights. It was in 1848 at Seneca Falls where close to a hundred women signed a Declaration for Women Rights including the right to vote. At the state level, the rise of sectional interest meant that there was more political participation as people felt that they were more obliged to defend their state interests than those of the federal government.
On the economic front, it was Jackson’s opposition to the Bank of the United States (BUS) which clearly illustrated his common man leanings. To Jackson, the bank was a symbol of the eastern elite who he abhorred. He decided to express his opposition by vetoing a Bill to rechrter the BUS in 1932. He explained this action by noting that a president had the right to veto any bill for whatever reason. This was understandable given that no other bill had been vetoed for purposes that were not solely constitutional. In the elections of the same year as the veto, Jackson still managed to win elections. This could have acted as an approval of his approach to the economy by the common man.
The Nullification crisis is a clear example of an occasion where this played out. South Carolina had opposed a tax imposed by the federal government by declaring to nullify that tax. The two sides had to reach a compromise. Prior to the compromise, South Carolina had threatened to nullify its application within her territory. Her argument was that the state had the right to oppose the tax given that it had voluntarily joined the union. Jackson on his part even threatened to send federal troops to South Carolina to collect the tax. Whatever the outcome of that struggle, it defined the relationship between the state and the federal governments.    
A common man era it was indeed as the foregoing discussion has been able to establish. It should, however, be noted that there were some sections of the American population that did not enjoy the many reforms introduced by Andrew Jackson. For instance, Indians were never factored in the changes that accompanied the period. Nevertheless, that period can be said to have lived up to its characterization to the extent that it enhanced the welfare of the white common man.


SHARE

College Assignment Samples

  • Image
  • Image
  • Image
  • Image
  • Image
    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments:

Post a Comment