Question 1
The underlying difference between the two
aspects of due process is that the substantive aspects relates to the essence
of important rights such as life, liberty and property as provided under
the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment(Alexander & Alexander,2013). In contrast, procedural due process
outlines the modalities for determining whether the substantive rights have
been violated. Thus, the law requires that one be accorded procedural due
process whenever there is a threat to the substantive rights of life, liberty
and property. In the case public education setting, a teacher can acquire
property interest in her job if his or her terms of employment create
expectations of continued employment (Alexander & Alexander, 2013). Tenured
teachers are considered to have this property right in their employment. This
obligates the relevant school authorities to accord pre-termination procedural
guarantees to these teachers. In Harrah
Independent School District v, Martin, the court was keen to note that
Martin had indeed been accorded procedural due process. In come to that
conclusion, the court was simply referring to the back and forth communications
that had taken place between Martin and the school authorities including a
hearing.
In the same Harrah case, the court also
clarified that Martin had not shown that his dismissal for non compliance had
anything to do with relating to freedom of choice matters (Alexander&
Alexander, 2013). It is evident from the foregoing that the two aspects of due
process are interdependent such that the possession of substantive aspect
entitles one to the procedural aspect. This was the position in Cleveland v. Loudermill Perhaps an illustration from real life could be the
denial to renew the practicing certificate by a state bar to an attorney who
has been practicing law in the given state. The attorney has a property
interest in his practice creating a situation of substantive due process. The
State Bar Association is complying with procedural due process when it conducts
hearings prior to denying the license.
Reference
Alexander, K., & Alexander, D.(2013).American Public School Law,8th
Edition.Belmont,CA:Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
0 comments:
Post a Comment